Skip to main content

State v. Thompson

Citations

  • 48 Wash. 683
  • 94 P. 667
  • 1908 Wash. LEXIS 944

Syllabus

<p>Physicians and Suegeons — Pbacticing Dentistey — Ceiminal Law — Evidence—Sufficiency. The evidence is sufficient to sustain a conviction for practicing dentistry without a license where it appears that defendant, who had no license, made a new mouth plate for the prosecuting witness at the agreed price of $5, and in order to take an impression and fit the plate, extracted a tooth, although no independent charge was made for extracting the tooth; since taking the impression was in itself the practicing of dentistry.</p> <p>Same — Requieement of License — Constitutional Law. Bal. Code, § 3032 prohibiting the practice of dentistry without a license is not unconstitutional.</p>

Judges: Mount

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.