Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/1/2019

State v. Thompson

Citations

2019 Ohio 4505

Syllabus

Appellant's sentence was not contrary to law where the trial court expressly considered the principles and purposes of sentencing under R.C. 2929.11, as well as the seriousness and recidivism factors under R.C. 2929.12, prior to imposing sentence.

Judges: Zmuda

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

State v. Moore
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2021-11-10· cited 5×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

State v. Foster
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 3,571×
State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)
Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
State v. Mathis
Ohio Supreme Court· 2006-02-27· cited 1,010×
State v. Arnett
Ohio Supreme Court· 2000-03-15· cited 630×
State v. Brimacombe
Ohio Court of Appeals· 2011-09-30· cited 96×

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.