State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Rule 24.02 (Rule 23.08’s predecessor) “fixes two conjunctive requirements, namely, that no additional or different offense be charged and that substantial rights be not prejudiced”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• State v. O'NEILL
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1990-08-01· cited 105×
• State v. McKeehan
  Idaho Supreme Court· 1967-07-18· cited 64×
• State v. Gladies
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1970-07-13· cited 30×
• State v. Couch
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-05-05· cited 20×
• State v. Thompson
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1967-04-10· cited 20×
• State v. Colbart
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1967-02-13· cited 15×
• State v. Fitzpatrick
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-02-28· cited 15×
• State of Missouri v. Kyle W. Nelson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2016-12-13· cited 15×
• State v. Merritt
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-10-29· cited 13×
• State v. Starks
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1967-09-11· cited 10×
• Johnson v. State
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1972-10-09· cited 10×
• State v. Reichenbacher
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1984-07-10· cited 10×
• State v. Cardwell
  Montana Supreme Court· 1981-03-24· cited 8×
• Wickline v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1986-09-03· cited 5×
• State ex rel. Wickline v. Casteel
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-05-01· cited 5×
• Williams v. State
  W.D. Missouri· 1970-08-24· cited 5×
• State v. Williams
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1967-11-13· cited 4×
• State v. Ralls
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1971-10-04· cited 4×
• State ex rel. Thomas v. Crouch
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-07-15· cited 3×
• Winningham v. State
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1983-01-25· cited 3×