State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding, in case where officers observed vehicles with missing equipment, that: “at the time of the stops, there was a reasonable possibility that defendants were committing a traffic offense – operating a vehicle without a valid inspection certification.”
• analyzing whether facts were “sufficient to establish a reasonable and articulable suspicion that a traffic offense was being committed” rather than “deciding whether the defendants had committed traffic offenses because of the missing equipment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Gregory W. Zullo v. State of Vermont
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2019-01-04· cited 21×
• State v. Rutter
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2011-01-31· cited 19×
• State v. Marshall
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2010-09-28· cited 8×
• State v. Stephen Howard
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2016-04-29· cited 3×
• State v. Anthony Brunetta
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2020-12-18· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Terry v. Ohio
  Supreme Court· 1968-06-10· cited 37,942×
• State v. Lussier
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 2000-04-28· cited 72×
• State v. Sutphin
  Supreme Court of Vermont· 1992-05-22· cited 27×