Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/11/1994
State v. Thompson
Citations
- 870 P.2d 1022
- 73 Wash. App. 654
- 1994 Wash. App. LEXIS 158
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that evidence establishing that the victim disappeared without contacting friends or family, providing for her cat, and after having made future appointments, strongly indicated she was dead and that her death was caused by criminal conduct
- relying on the victim’s habits regarding housework, patterns of contact with her friends, and care of her pets, as well as evidence that she disappeared suddenly and without warning, as creating a strong inference that she died and her death was sudden and caused by criminal means
- relying on the victim’s habits regarding housework, patterns of contact with her friends, and care of her pets, as well as evidence that she disappeared suddenly and without warning, as creating a strong inference that she died and her death was sudden and caused by criminal means
- “A defendant’s extrajudicial confession is not admissible at trial unless independent proof establishes the corpus delicti of a crime.” (emphasis added)
- \[HJabit describes one's regular response to a repeated specific situation so that doing the habitual act becomes semi-automatic. It is the notion of the invariable regularity that gives habit evidence its probative force.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Coleman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AtenWashington Supreme Court· 1996-11-27· cited 189×
- State v. HummelCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2012-01-03· cited 24×
- State v. RooksCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2005-12-19· cited 20×
- Rivera v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-05-04· cited 12×
- Ventura v. PeopleSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands· 2016-05-04· cited 6×
- State v. Perez-CervantesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-03-13· cited 3×
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. GreenWashington Supreme Court· 1980-08-28· cited 1,403×
- State v. HoffmanWashington Supreme Court· 1991-01-10· cited 461×
- Epperly v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1982-09-09· cited 179×
- State v. ReedWashington Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 175×
- State v. CaseWashington Supreme Court· 1956-06-07· cited 140×
- Hudson v. LouisianaSupreme Court· 1971-06-28· cited 137×
- City of Bremerton v. CorbettWashington Supreme Court· 1986-08-21· cited 110×
- State v. MeyerWashington Supreme Court· 1951-01-04· cited 108×
- State v. AdamsWashington Supreme Court· 1969-09-11· cited 107×
- State v. LungWashington Supreme Court· 1967-01-26· cited 64×
- Maehren v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court· 1979-08-10· cited 61×
- State v. NeslundCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-02-08· cited 57×
- State v. StithCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1993-08-16· cited 49×
- State v. ReederWashington Supreme Court· 1955-07-14· cited 41×
- State v. StoverCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-08-24· cited 30×
- University of Hawaii Professional Assembly v. University of HawaiiHawaii Supreme Court· 1983-02-18· cited 29×
- State v. SellersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-02-15· cited 28×
- Derring v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas· 1981-07-13· cited 22×
- State v. QuillinCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-08-25· cited 21×
- Norris v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-02-18· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.