State v. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence that the defendant’s forging of vehicle registrations showed intent to defraud because inaccurate records “impaired a government function”
• “[I]t is irrelevant whether anyone was actually injured.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Moreno v. Jones
  Arizona Supreme Court· 2006-08-09· cited 37×
• State v. Miranda
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-09-28· cited 22×
• Prosise v. Hon kottke/state
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2020-06-09· cited 18×
• State of Arizona v. Vincent Michael Allen
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2014-06-04· cited 10×
• State of Arizona v. Javier Fimbres
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2009-08-07

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McNally v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1987-06-24· cited 1,314×
• State v. Portillo
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1995-06-29· cited 115×
• City of Phoenix v. Leroy's Liquors, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-06-22· cited 62×
• Gates v. United States
  Tenth Circuit· 1941-08-27· cited 36×
• Myers v. Reeb
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-10-07· cited 32×
• State v. Maxwell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1964-04-16· cited 27×
• United States v. Goldsmith
  Second Circuit· 1933-12-18· cited 24×
• State v. Young
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-05-07· cited 15×
• Johnson v. Warden
  Ninth Circuit· 1943-02-26· cited 15×
• State v. McMurry
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-12-14· cited 9×
• State v. Tucker
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-05-03· cited 9×
• United States v. Tommasello
  Second Circuit· 1947-02-28· cited 9×
• State v. Watkins
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1988-10-12· cited 5×