Court of Appeals of Arizona· 8/22/1989
State v. Thomason
Citations
- 783 P.2d 809
- 162 Ariz. 363
- 41 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 27
- 1989 Ariz. App. LEXIS 224
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A statute should be explained in conjunction with other statutes which relate to the same subject or have the same general purpose.”
- statute “is applicable only to persons protecting the home, its contents, or the residents within,” and defendant could not invoke defense because m urder occu rred on bu siness prem ises
- statutes should be construed “in light of their purpose”
- statutes should be construed \in light of their purpose\
- “Courts construe seemingly conflicting statutes in harmony when possible.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brooks, Jacobson, Fidel
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
25 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. KorzepArizona Supreme Court· 1990-10-04· cited 120×
- John C. Lincoln Hospital v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-09-01· cited 106×
- Western Corrections Group, Inc. v. TierneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2004-08-31· cited 38×
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court· 1991-09-17· cited 37×
- Arizona Minority Coalition for Fair Redistricting v. Arizona Independent Redistricting CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-10-21· cited 34×
- State v. HussainCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1997-07-29· cited 31×
- State of Arizona v. Andy Daniel AlmeidaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2015-08-19· cited 26×
- Goulder v. ARIZONA DEPT. OF TRANSP., MOTOR VEH.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1994-03-01· cited 25×
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1995-03-16· cited 21×
- Johnson v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2003-10-14· cited 21×
- State v. BarrazaCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-01-11· cited 19×
- State v. HensleyCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-09-20· cited 18×
- State ex rel. Department of Economic Security v. DemetzCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2006-03-28· cited 10×
- State v. SamanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2000-10-17· cited 7×
- Goulder v. Arizona Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1993-09-07· cited 4×
- Camelback Plaza Development, L.C. v. Hard Rock Café International (Phoenix), Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2001-05-22· cited 4×
- Phoenix City Prosecutor's Office v. YbarraCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2007-06-21· cited 4×
- State v. KorzepCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1989-12-26· cited 3×
- Lee v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 1992-09-03· cited 2×
- Steven K. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona· 2005-06-23· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.