State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• unlawful imprisonment required that the defendant “‘knowingly restrain[] another person’” whereas custodial interference required that the defendant “‘know[] that he has no legal right’” to interfere with custody (quoting RCW 9A.40.010(1); 9A.40.050(1))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Gogolin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1986-10-13· cited 61×
• State v. Russell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2001-01-19· cited 26×
• State v. Numrich
  Washington Supreme Court· 2021-02-04· cited 7×
• State v. Alfonso
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1985-06-27· cited 6×
• State v. Bushey
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1987-01-21· cited 4×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Tharp
  Washington Supreme Court· 1981-12-17· cited 294×
• State v. Saltarelli
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-12-16· cited 227×
• State v. Zornes
  Washington Supreme Court· 1970-05-14· cited 154×
• State v. Goebel
  Washington Supreme Court· 1952-01-24· cited 128×
• State v. Danforth
  Washington Supreme Court· 1982-04-22· cited 94×
• State v. Cann
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-05-24· cited 64×
• State v. Walls
  Washington Supreme Court· 1972-12-07· cited 34×
• State v. Robinson
  Washington Supreme Court· 1979-07-19· cited 32×
• State v. Bower
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1981-03-23· cited 28×
• State v. Martell
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1979-01-16· cited 26×
• State v. Darrin
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1982-06-28· cited 7×