State v. Thomas

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• tracing the history of the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt
• tracing the history of the requirement of proof beyond a reasonable doubt
• right to require proof beyond a reasonable doubt for conviction of crime existed before Oregon became a territory or a state
• parties cannot limit appellate court to only the arguments that the parties raise
• parties cannot limit appellate court to only the arguments that the parties raise
• “If theft III, as a violation, retains traits that characterize a criminal prosecution, then [the] defendant’s rights to a jury trial and to have her guilt proven beyond a reasonable doubt cannot be abrogated[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Williams
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 125×
• ESLAMIZAR
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 2004-07-01· cited 30×
• Pierce v. Allstate Insurance
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1993-04-08· cited 20×
• State v. Bonnin
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1996-10-30· cited 8×
• State v. Rode
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-03-17· cited 8×
• State v. Fuller
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-26· cited 3×
• State v. Hardt
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-07-01

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Hitz
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1988-12-20· cited 253×
• Brown v. Multnomah County District Court
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-10-12· cited 214×
• State v. Freeland
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1983-07-26· cited 89×
• State v. Spada
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-05-08· cited 42×
• Zollinger v. Warner
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 16×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1989-10-18· cited 9×
• State v. Thomas
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-05-16· cited 1×