Skip to main content
· 7/23/2012

State v. Thirsty

Citations

  • 92 So. 3d 350
  • 2012 WL 3174086
  • 2012 La. LEXIS 2025

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \the trial court . . . would have been justified in ignoring the jury's recommendation that the sentences run concurrently.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.