State v. Theriault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• application of statutes to undisputed facts is a legal issue that we review de novo
• enhanced sentence for repeater is \not authorized by law\ and must be commuted when defendant does not admit, and State fails to prove, prior convictions necessary to establish habitual criminal status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Saunders
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 2002-07-16· cited 27×
• State v. Wagner
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 1995-01-31· cited 11×
• State v. Faust
  Court of Appeals of Wisconsin· 2003-10-01· cited 3×

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

• State v. Farr
  Wisconsin Supreme Court· 1984-06-28· cited 34×