State v. Theriault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a promotion-of-prostitution statute was “not substantially overbroad, because the possibility that it might be applied in some unconstitutional manner is exceedingly slight”
• holding that a promotion-of-prostitution statute was “not substantially overbroad, because the possibility that it might be applied in some unconstitutional 14 manner is exceedingly slight”
• concluding that “any applications of the statute that infringe upon protected conduct, to the extent that such applications exist, may be remedied on a case-by-case basis”
• concluding that “any applications of the statute that infringe upon protected conduct, to the extent that such applications exist, may be remedied on a case-by-case basis”
• “Certainly prostitution is not a constitutionally protected activity”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Commonwealth v. McGhee
  Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2015-08-13· cited 38×
• State v. Gubitosi
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2008-10-10· cited 18×
• State of Minnesota v. Antonio Dion Washington-Davis
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 2016-06-29· cited 11×
• In re D.J.
  Supreme Court of New Hampshire· 2023-07-13