State v. Terry

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that five-card stud did not fall under a statute outlawing three-card monte, and that under the legislative history of the statute “its obvious purpose was to stamp out the game or any such game .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Jordan
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 2016-03-25· cited 119×
• State v. Waite
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1942-12-12· cited 39×
• State Ex Rel. Ferguson v. American Savings Stamp Co.
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1965-02-05· cited 33×
• State v. Sleeth
  Court of Appeals of Kansas· 1983-06-16· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Dent
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2010-03-25· cited 12×
• Brown v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1979-02-20· cited 11×
• State v. Vakas
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1987-10-30· cited 11×
• State v. Finley
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1967-11-13· cited 11×
• State v. Hoggard
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1937-06-12· cited 4×
• State v. Hale
  Montana Supreme Court· 1958-08-07· cited 3×
• Thorne v. United States
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1982-10-27

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Prather
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1909-02-06· cited 20×
• State v. Brown
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1925-06-06· cited 10×
• State v. Edgen
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1904-05-11· cited 10×
• State v. Gray
  Supreme Court of Minnesota· 1882-05-27· cited 9×
• State v. Keester
  Supreme Court of Kansas· 1926-06-12· cited 4×