State v. Tenold

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in determining whether the distress is compensable absent a showing of physical or mental injury, “we will look to whether tortious conduct results in a substantial invasion of a legally protected interest and causes a significant impact upon the person of plaintiff”
• allowing recovery for mental distress absent a showing of physical injury
• Montana Supreme Court distinguished mental and emotional harm from physical harm

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).