State v. Teems

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the trial court “could not” reappoint the attorney who was familiar with Teems’ case and had to appoint new counsel, contributing to the delay
• defendant need not show prejudice from denial of right to speedy trial
• CrR 8.3(b) dismissal of charges was proper after trial notice was served to withdrawn counsel, and new counsel had 12 days to prepare for trial, forcing defendant to choose between a speedy trial and effective representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).