State v. Teel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “When determining the sufficiency of the evidence, then, an appellate court is not bound to consider a witness’ testimony if it is impossible to reconcile with physical evidence.”
• “When determining the sufficiency of the evidence, then, an appellate court is not bound to consider a witness’ testimony if it is impossible to reconcile with physical evidence.”
• “From the scanty, indefinite and indecisive proof adduced at appellant’s trial, it is wholly inconceivable, by any process of logic or reasoning from the facts disclosed in this record, how appellant might, could, or did, board a moving freight car, traveling ten (10) to fifteen (15

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).