State v. Teal

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding, in a nonescape case, that where two sentences erroneously were both made consecutive to each other, the first sentence pronounced would be the first served and only the second sentence would be deemed consecutive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Oban
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1985-07-31· cited 43×
• State v. Horn
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1993-11-30· cited 34×
• State v. Dorr
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1991-07-01· cited 30×
• State v. Mendenhall
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1984-03-15· cited 18×
• Lewis v. Class
  South Dakota Supreme Court· 1997-06-04· cited 13×
• State v. Moliga
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1987-12-09· cited 13×
• State v. Wavrick
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1992-12-28· cited 10×
• Wilson v. Hambleton
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1985-08-30· cited 3×
• State v. Chilton
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-06-05· cited 3×
• Ontiveros v. Utah Board of Pardons
  Court of Appeals of Utah· 1995-06-15· cited 1×
• Chapa v. State
  Idaho Court of Appeals· 1989-01-06· cited 1×