State v. Taylor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Fact that both witnesses observed defendant in courtroom during preliminary hearing, in handcuffs, shackles, and jail clothes, did not render their in-court identification inadmissible.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Cochran v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1984-04-24· cited 123×
• State v. Winters
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1995-05-02· cited 14×
• Barber v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2015-06-04· cited 4×
• State v. Surgeon
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1991-11-12· cited 4×
• State v. Taylor
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1987-03-10· cited 1×

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Wong Sun v. United States
  Supreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
• Foster v. California
  Supreme Court· 1969-04-01· cited 1,048×
• State v. Young
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1976-03-01· cited 29×
• State v. Ralls
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-06-11· cited 24×
• State v. Johnson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-01-05· cited 19×
• State v. Terry
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1979-04-30· cited 15×
• State v. Gregory
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1982-03-09· cited 13×
• State v. Dickerson
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1978-06-13· cited 13×
• State v. McGrath
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1980-06-10· cited 11×
• State v. Rice
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1975-04-22· cited 10×
• State v. Smith
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 1977-02-08· cited 2×