Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 9/1/2021
State v. Taylor
Syllabus
The question in this case is whether \inferred malice\ is inconsistent with the specific intent to kill required for attempted murder. We hold it is permissible for the jury infer a defendant acted with a specific intent to kill.
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2001-04-23· cited 334×
- State v. BurkhartSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2002-06-17· cited 83×
- State v. BelcherSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2009-10-12· cited 80×
- Keys v. StateNevada Supreme Court· 1988-12-29· cited 63×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2009-06-17· cited 49×
- State v. KingSupreme Court of South Carolina· 2017-10-25· cited 44×
- Calvin Williams v. Ross Maggio, Jr., Warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, and the Attorney General of the State of LouisianaFifth Circuit· 1983-05-02· cited 9×
- State v. ShandsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina· 2018-06-13· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.