State v. Taylor
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 3806
Syllabus
Nunc pro tunc final appealable order. Defendant appealed from a nunc pro tunc entry. A sentencing entry that is corrected by a nunc pro tunc entry to reflect what actually occurred at the sentencing hearing does not extend the time to file an appeal from the original judgment of conviction and does not create a new final appealable order. Defendant's appeal was therefore dismissed because he did not appeal from a final appealable order.
Judges: Boyle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Bonnell (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2014-07-24· cited 1,841×
- State v. FischerOhio Supreme Court· 2010-12-23· cited 1,066×
- State v. LesterOhio Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 501×
- State v. BakerOhio Supreme Court· 2008-07-09· cited 500×
- State v. QuallsOhio Supreme Court· 2012-03-20· cited 244×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-10· cited 1×
- State v. TaylorOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-12-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.