Skip to main content

State v. Taylor

Citations

  • 2019 Ohio 1376

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in denying Appellant's \motion to correct allied offenses\ based on lack of jurisdiction. If the trial court had ruled on Appellant's motion, it would have been inconsistent with the appellate court's ability to reverse, affirm, or modify another ruling that Appellant had appealed, which was then pending on appeal. In addition, Appellant's motion seeking merger of offenses was barred by res judicata, as Appellant failed to raise this issue during his direct appeal. Judgment affirmed.

Judges: Welbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.