Supreme Court of Minnesota· 7/17/1970
State v. Taylor
Citations
- 178 N.W.2d 892
- 288 Minn. 37
- 1970 Minn. LEXIS 987
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[T]he integrity of a guilty plea as a solemn commitment would be tarnished if an accused were allowed to play games with the judicial process.” (quotations omitted)
- factual basis existed where defendant negated element of self-defense before a second judge and where defendant had extensive contact with counsel so that it was clear that he was aware of element of charge and consequences of admitting guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Peterson, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. NeumannSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1978-01-20· cited 45×
- State v. LyleCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-07-28· cited 8×
- State v. LillemoCourt of Appeals of Minnesota· 1987-08-11· cited 2×
- State v. HowardSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-04-12
- State v. GraySupreme Court of Minnesota· 1974-04-26
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court· 1969-06-02· cited 12,640×
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-04-02· cited 3,200×
- Chapman v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-11-01· cited 61×
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1968-02-02· cited 37×
- State Ex Rel. Fruhrman v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1966-11-04· cited 29×
- Gallagher v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-03-20· cited 5×
- Andrews v. HossSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1970-01-23· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.