State v. Taylor
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 5034
Syllabus
Defendant understood nature of the charges such that his plea is knowing, intelligent, and voluntary where although no facts were recited at plea hearing, he received pretrial discovery, was awarded funds to hire a criminal investigator, acknowledged he was admitting to the allegations in the charge, went over the plea form with his attorney that stated he understood the nature of the charges, and where he had no further questions.
Judges: Sulek
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. NeroOhio Supreme Court· 1990-12-19· cited 1,637×
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court· 1976-06-17· cited 1,382×
- State v. Jones (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-12-18· cited 926×
- State v. Dangler (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2020-05-05· cited 408×
- State v. DuhartOhio Court of Appeals· 2017-09-29· cited 9×
- State v. EamesOhio Court of Appeals· 2024-01-19· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.