Skip to main content
· 9/20/2021

State v. Taste

Citations

  • 2021 Ohio 3286

Syllabus

The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress where appellant made statements to a trooper after impliedly waiving his right to silence because appellant was given warnings regarding his right to remain silent but chose to answer some of the questions posed by the trooper. The trooper did not need to reissue the warnings because only two hours had passed between the initial warnings and the time when appellant chose to answer some of the questions.

Judges: Piper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.