State v. Taste
Citations
- 2021 Ohio 3286
Syllabus
The trial court properly denied appellant's motion to suppress where appellant made statements to a trooper after impliedly waiving his right to silence because appellant was given warnings regarding his right to remain silent but chose to answer some of the questions posed by the trooper. The trooper did not need to reissue the warnings because only two hours had passed between the initial warnings and the time when appellant chose to answer some of the questions.
Judges: Piper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.