State v. Tarnavsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting Supreme Court’s comment that mandatory and jurisdictional time limits “‘are not subject to equitable tolling’” (quoting Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Serv., 514 U.S. 386, 405 (1995)
• “[T]he federal rules of procedure can be relied on for interpreting a statutory time period in the absence of any more statute-specific provisions or indication that Congress did not intend the rules to apply.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).