State v. Tarbet

Citations

• 2022 Ohio 1005

Syllabus

CRIMINAL LAW - Tampering with Records R.C. 2913.42(A)(1) Petty Theft R.C. 2913.02(A)(3) evidence was sufficient to support conviction Crim.R. 29(A) convictions were not against the manifest weight of the evidence statements made during closing arguments of prior bad acts was not reversible error as defendant was not prejudiced by the statements, which the jury was instructed not to consider as evidence failure to exclude evidence of prior bad acts was not error as the act in question was particularly relevant to the case as the day the investigation began and the day defendant lied about discrepancies probative value of admission of the evidence outweighed the potential for unfair prejudice affirmed.