State v. Tapp

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Because the state bears the burden of proving attenuation, in the absence of any such argument [about attenuation] our case law dictates that suppression is required.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. T. T.
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-06· cited 10×
• State v. Bowen
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-13· cited 9×
• State v. Sherriff
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2020-04-22· cited 8×
• State v. Decker
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-02-22· cited 5×
• State v. Peterson
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2017-03-29

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Valdez
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1977-03-24· cited 229×
• State v. Maciel-Figueroa
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2017-03-02· cited 137×
• State v. Miglavs
  Oregon Supreme Court· 2004-05-20· cited 56×
• State v. Maciel
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-01-16· cited 25×
• State v. Pope
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1998-01-27· cited 17×
• State v. Kimmons
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2015-06-10· cited 14×
• State v. Farrar
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-09-12· cited 13×
• State v. Meza-Garcia
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-05-30· cited 7×
• State v. Lovell
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-01-27· cited 2×