State v. Tansey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, where the law is dispositive, the claim must be denied due to an absence of legal entitlement
• holding that remands that would only result in imposing additional burdens on VA, with no benefit flowing to the claimant, are to be avoided
• holding that remands which would only result in unnecessarily imposing additional burdens on VA with no benefit flowing to the veteran are to be avoided
• holding that remands that would only result in imposing additional burdens on VA, with no benefit flowing to the claimant, are to be avoided
• holding that remands which would only result in unnecessarily imposing additional burdens on VA with no benefit flowing to the claimant are to be avoided
• holding that where law and not evidence is disposi-tive, claim should be denied or appeal terminated because of lack of legal merit or lack of entitlement under the law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).