State v. Tanner
Citations
- 2020 Ohio 5413
Syllabus
The record does not clearly and convincingly fail to support appellant's 12-month sentence for a felony of the fifth degree. Appellant was previously sentenced to prison and committed obstructing official business while on post-release control. In the absence of any objection or documentary evidence, the equal protection argument that appellant, who allegedly identifies as female, was improperly assigned to a male prison facility, is not properly preserved for appellate review moreover, the record reflects that appellant was identified as male in the presentence investigation report and the attached police report. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Donovan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- David HUEBSCHEN, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SOCIAL SERVICES and Jacquelyn Rader, Defendants-AppellantsSeventh Circuit· 1983-09-13· cited 175×
- Beatty v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court· 1981-08-12· cited 78×
- Eppley v. Tri-Valley Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court· 2009-05-05· cited 68×
- State v. MayberryOhio Court of Appeals· 2018-06-08· cited 18×
- State v. TurnerOhio Court of Appeals· 2011-01-28· cited 5×
- State v. ClemOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-02-28· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.