Skip to main content

State v. Tanner

Citations

  • 2025 Ohio 2087

Syllabus

The trial court erred in overruling appellant's motion to suppress. The facts known to the officer when he called for the drug-sniffing canine during the traffic stop were insufficient to rise to the level of reasonable suspicion of criminal activity to justify prolonging the stop, and the officer suspended his efforts to resolve the issue that led to the original stop until after the canine alerted. Judgment reversed and remanded.

Judges: Huffman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.