State v. Tamura

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that because the court stated its reasons for imposing an extended term of sentence on the record, the standard set forth in State v. Huelsman, 60 Haw. 71, 588 P.2d 394 (1978), was satisfied
• “The jury, as the trier of fact, is the sole judge of the credibility of witnesses or the weight of the evidence.”
• manner in which defendant committed the offense is proper basis for extended term sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).