Skip to main content
· 9/29/1994

State v. Taliferro

Citations

  • 881 P.2d 1264
  • 77 Haw. 196

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant’s testimony that he was angry because dog feces were left in his yard, and that he picked up the feces and walked to the complainant’s property in order to return them, was sufficient evidence to prove that the defendant intended to annoy the complainant

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Heen, Watanabe, Acoba

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.