State v. Takacs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining a statute is not unconstitutionally vague “simply because it is susceptible to more than one interpretation” or “could have been written with greater precision”
• reviewing court may look to legislative history as some indication of legislative intent; may also look to policy behind statute and wiH read statutes relating to same subject in harmony
• noting we may look to dictionary definitions to determine a term’s meaning
• “A statute is not unconstitutionally vague because one of its terms is not explicitly defined.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).