State v. Tabor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding cockfighting statute, which prohibits spectators who are knowingly and deliberately present at cockfight or at site where preparations are being made for such activities
• “[prohibiting the public exhibition of [cockfighting] can be reasonably achieved by making willful attendance at them a criminal offense”
• determining “there was nothing either uncertain or unclear about the meaning of’ the Tennessee statute “prohibiting persons from knowingly being present as spectators at a cockfight or similar exhibition, or at a place where preparations are being made for such an exhibition”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Edmondson v. Pearce
  Supreme Court of Oklahoma· 2004-07-28· cited 87×
• State v. Young
  Supreme Court of Missouri· 1985-09-10· cited 47×
• People v. Bergen
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 1994-04-21· cited 24×
• People v. Superior Court (Elder)
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-06-03· cited 11×
• Gonzalez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-11-17· cited 4×
• State v. Bonilla
  Connecticut Appellate Court· 2011-09-13· cited 4×
• Steven Elmer Hinds v. the State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 2021-06-24
• Commonwealth v. Hart
  Monroe County Court of Common Pleas· 1986-09-12