State v. Symith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding substantial question raised where the appellant averred an unexplained disparity between his sentence and that of his co-defendant
• holding substantial question raised where Cleveland averred an unexplained disparity between his sentence and that of his co- defendant
• claim “alleging an unexplained disparity between [defendant’s] sentence and that of a co-defendant” implicates the discretionary aspects of sentencing
• “[W]hen there is a disparity between co-defendants’ sentences, a sentencing court must give reasons particular to each defendant explaining why [he or she] received [his or her individual sentence].”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).