Skip to main content

State v. Sykes

Citations

  • 2022 Ohio 865

Syllabus

(1) Complaint was not defective as it contained essential facts that informed appellant of the offense with which he was charged counsel not ineffective for failing to move to dismiss. (2) Child endangering charge was not against the sufficiency of the evidence. (3) Domestic violence charge was not against the weight of the evidence. (4) Assault charge was not against the sufficiency of the evidence.

Judges: Duhart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.