State v. Sykes
Citations
- 2022 Ohio 865
Syllabus
(1) Complaint was not defective as it contained essential facts that informed appellant of the offense with which he was charged counsel not ineffective for failing to move to dismiss. (2) Child endangering charge was not against the sufficiency of the evidence. (3) Domestic violence charge was not against the weight of the evidence. (4) Assault charge was not against the sufficiency of the evidence.
Judges: Duhart
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court· 1997-05-14· cited 16,183×
- State v. ClaytonOhio Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 898×
- State v. McGeeOhio Supreme Court· 1997-07-16· cited 150×
- State v. Flores SantiagoOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-04-02· cited 38×
- State v. SmithOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-07-27· cited 22×
- State v. KouameOhio Court of Appeals· 2020-05-28· cited 6×
- State v. VertreesOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-04-12· cited 3×
- Toledo v. EbraheimOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.