Oregon Supreme Court· 1/25/1921
State v. Swank
Citations
- 99 Or. 571
- 195 P. 168
- 1921 Ore. LEXIS 38
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “ ‘Where the forged instrument is mailed in one county and received in another, venue of the offense of uttering the forged instrument is in the latter county.’ ” (citation omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bean, Brown, Burnett, Johns
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court· 1959-07-15· cited 19×
- State v. AtkinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1977-03-28· cited 10×
- State v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-05-04· cited 7×
- Morrison v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1970-05-15· cited 4×
- STATE v. DEGRAFFENREID, III (JAMES) (CRIMINAL)Nevada Supreme Court· 2025-11-13
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. DoughertyOregon Supreme Court· 1871-09-15· cited 26×
- State v. WheelerOregon Supreme Court· 1890-12-16· cited 23×
- State v. GuglielmoOregon Supreme Court· 1905-02-20· cited 21×
- State v. FordOregon Supreme Court· 1918-05-14· cited 13×
- State v. SmithOregon Supreme Court· 1899-01-03· cited 8×
- People v. HoytAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1911-06-28· cited 7×
- State v. GreenwoodSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1899-05-09· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.