Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1/11/2018
State v. Sutherland
Citations
- 231 N.J. 429
- 176 A.3d 775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- describing Justice Kagan's concurrence as containing \several important caveats\ and collecting cases that \either followed or acknowledged [her] narrow interpretation of an objectively reasonable mistake of law\
- describing Justice Kagan’s concurrence as containing “several important caveats” and collecting cases that “either followed or acknowledged [her] narrow interpretation of an objectively reasonable mistake of law”
- “When interpreting a statute we look first, and foremost, to its actual language and ascribe to its words their ordinary meaning.”
- “[A] number of states have either followed or acknowledged Justice Kagan’s narrow interpretation of an objectively reasonable mistake of law when deciding similar issues under the rubric of Heien’s analysis.”
- “[A] reasonable mistake of fact on the part of a police officer will not render a search or arrest predicated on that mistake unconstitutional.” (citing State v. Handy, 206 N.J. 39, 53-54 (2011))
- “[A] reasonable mistake of fact on the part of a police officer will not render a search or arrest predicated on that mistake unconstitutional.” (citing State v. Handy, 206 N.J. 39, 53-54 (2011))
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Albin, Fernandez, Lavecchia, Patterson, Rabner, Solomon, Timpone, Vina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. BurnettSupreme Court of Colorado· 2019-01-14· cited 172×
- State of Iowa v. Jeffrey Alan MeyersSupreme Court of Iowa· 2020-01-31
- Antonio Chaparro Nieves v. Office of the Public Defender (082262)(Union County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2020-04-15
- State v. Miguel A. Roman-Rosado (084074) (Burlington & Gloucester County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2021-08-02
- State v. Darius J. Carter (083211) (Burlington & Gloucester County & Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2021-08-02
- State v. Rashaun Bell (084657) (Statewide)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2022-05-16
- State of West Virginia v. Sean Allen TaylorWest Virginia Supreme Court· 2024-11-20
Cites
29 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Cady v. DombrowskiSupreme Court· 1973-06-21· cited 2,465×
- DiProspero v. PennSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2005-06-14· cited 1,036×
- State v. LocurtoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1999-03-02· cited 859×
- Heien v. North CarolinaSupreme Court· 2014-12-15· cited 619×
- State v. NovembrinoSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-01-07· cited 387×
- United States of America,plaintiff-Appellee v. Armando Lopez-SotoNinth Circuit· 2000-03-08· cited 251×
- The People v. Rebecca GuthrieNew York Court of Appeals· 2015-04-07· cited 205×
- State v. HandySupreme Court of New Jersey· 2011-04-26· cited 198×
- Mason v. City of HobokenSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2008-07-22· cited 176×
- State v. Al-Sharif Scriven(075682)Supreme Court of New Jersey· 2016-07-20· cited 159×
- United States v. Sonia Luz Lopez-ValdezFifth Circuit· 1999-06-01· cited 131×
- State v. EdmondsSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2012-07-26· cited 123×
- Simon v. CroneckerSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2007-01-29· cited 54×
- State v. WilliamsonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1994-12-19· cited 53×
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of New Jersey· 2009-01-27· cited 46×
- State v. WrightSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2010-12-08· cited 23×
- Gunn v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2011-10-24· cited 21×
- State v. HurleySupreme Court of Vermont· 2015-03-06· cited 21×
- State v. PuzioNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2005-08-01· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.