Skip to main content
· 12/18/2023

State v. Suter

Citations

  • 2023 Ohio 4590

Syllabus

Anders no error.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • law firm obtaining admission from insured in the course of representing insurer against third-party claim should withdraw from further representation in lawsuit between insurer and insured
  • before trial in tort action, determination of prejudice would be “speculative,” and this “inherent uncertainty has prompted courts to postpone or deny declaratory relief when the underlying tort action is pending”
  • new version of accident was “not a bolt from the blue;” insurer had had ample time to investigate that version, to negotiate a settlement, and/or to prepare for trial that had not yet occurred

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.