Washington Supreme Court· 3/3/2016
State v. Sundberg
Citations
- 185 Wash. 2d 147
- 370 P.3d 1
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- missing witness instruction appropriate when defendant asserted affirmative defense of unwitting possession of controlled substances and testified a man not previously mentioned to the State lent him overalls that contained the drugs
- noting misconduct to shift burden of proof to defense
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairhurst, González, Johnson, Madsen, McCloud, Owens, Stephens, Wiggins
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court· 1970-05-18· cited 11,712×
- State v. ThorgersonWashington Supreme Court· 2011-08-25· cited 702×
- State v. MontgomeryWashington Supreme Court· 2008-05-15· cited 269×
- State v. W.R.Washington Supreme Court· 2014-10-30· cited 209×
- State v. DavisWashington Supreme Court· 1968-03-06· cited 162×
- State v. CheatamWashington Supreme Court· 2003-12-11· cited 160×
- State v. BlairWashington Supreme Court· 1991-09-19· cited 140×
- State v. BarrowCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-04-15· cited 66×
- State v. ContrerasCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-04-09· cited 49×
- State v. SundbergWashington Supreme Court· 2015-09-30· cited 3×
- State v. SundbergCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2015-02-10· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.