State v. Sullivan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that because the defendant failed to object to the testimony and did not cite the testimony’s admission in later motions, the error was not preserved for review on appeal
• holding that when a party successfully moves in limine to exclude evidence, it is still required to object to the introduction of that evidence at trial in order to allow the trial court an opportunity to cure any potential prejudice and preserve the matter for appeal
• “ʻ[A] litigant cannot remain silent as to claimed error during trial and later, for the first time, urge objections thereto on appeal.ʼ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Emery
  Washington Supreme Court· 2012-06-14· cited 1,088×
• State v. Fisher
  Washington Supreme Court· 2009-03-12· cited 392×
• State v. Weber
  Washington Supreme Court· 2006-12-28· cited 328×
• State v. Strine
  Washington Supreme Court· 2013-01-31· cited 68×
• State v. Ra
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2008-01-29· cited 34×
• City Of Seattle v. Jeffrey Levesque
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-03-16· cited 26×
• A.C. v. Bellingham School District
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2004-12-13· cited 24×
• State v. Pedro
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2009-02-23· cited 22×
• State Of Washington v. Alan D. Jenks
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-03-03· cited 8×
• State v. Koch
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-11· cited 7×
• State Of Washington, V. Christopher Fields
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2024-07-29· cited 3×
• AC Ex Rel. Cooper v. Bellingham School Dist.
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2005-01-05
• The Zurich Services Corporation, V. Gene Mace Construction, Llc
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2023-03-27