Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1/11/1993
State v. Sullivan
Citations
- 426 S.E.2d 766
- 310 S.C. 311
- 1993 S.C. LEXIS 8
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that [t]o preserve an issue for appellate review, an appellant must object at his first opportunity
- stating that “HGN tests shall not constitute evidence to establish a specific degree of blood alcohol content”
- noting that an appellant must object at his first opportunity to preserve an issue for appellate review
- holding the HGN is appropriately used only in conjunction with other tests, as a way of discerning the objective manifestations of intoxication
- noting that an appellant must object at his first opportunity to preserve an issue for appellate review
- holding “that evidence resulting from HGN tests, as from other field sobriety tests, is admissible when the HGN test was used to elicit objective manifestations of soberness or insobriety”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Finney, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court· 1995-07-07· cited 243×
- People v. LeahyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1994-10-27· cited 195×
- State v. BaueNebraska Supreme Court· 2000-03-10· cited 124×
- State v. ShaddenSupreme Court of Kansas· 2010-07-09· cited 119×
- People v. McKownIllinois Supreme Court· 2007-09-20· cited 95×
- State v. MurphyTennessee Supreme Court· 1997-10-13· cited 80×
- Young v. City of BrookhavenMississippi Supreme Court· 1997-05-15· cited 66×
- City of Fargo v. McLaughlinNorth Dakota Supreme Court· 1994-02-23· cited 60×
- United States v. HornD. Maryland· 2002-01-31· cited 53×
- State v. MerrittConnecticut Appellate Court· 1994-07-29· cited 52×
- Schultz v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1995-08-31· cited 50×
- State v. AldretSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1999-01-04· cited 49×
- State v. ItoHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1999-05-24· cited 46×
- State v. MeadorDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-05-15· cited 43×
- State v. RoseMissouri Court of Appeals· 2002-07-30· cited 43×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-03-18· cited 39×
- Ballard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1998-04-03· cited 38×
- State v. RuthardtSuperior Court of Delaware· 1996-03-21· cited 35×
- State v. DoriguzziNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 2000-10-20· cited 33×
- State v. DahoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 2002-12-20· cited 28×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court· 1986-04-07· cited 185×
- State v. GarrettIdaho Supreme Court· 1991-05-09· cited 73×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-02-11· cited 70×
- State v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1976-01-06· cited 25×
- State v. DegnanSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1991-08-12· cited 12×
- Lloyd v. LloydSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1988-04-04· cited 9×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.