Skip to main content

State v. Sullivan

Citations

  • 426 S.E.2d 766
  • 310 S.C. 311
  • 1993 S.C. LEXIS 8

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “[t]o preserve an issue for appellate review, an appellant must object at his first opportunity”
  • stating that “HGN tests shall not constitute evidence to establish a specific degree of blood alcohol content”
  • noting that an appellant must object at his first opportunity to preserve an issue for appellate review
  • holding the HGN is appropriately used only in conjunction with other tests, as a way of discerning the objective manifestations of intoxication
  • noting that an appellant must object at his first opportunity to preserve an issue for appellate review
  • holding “that evidence resulting from HGN tests, as from other field sobriety tests, is admissible when the HGN test was used to elicit objective manifestations of soberness or insobriety”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Finney, Harwell, Chandler, Toal, Moore

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.