State v. Sullens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• to justify new trial, new evidence must be such as will probably change the outcome of the trial and could not have been discovered beforehand through exercise of due diligence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Booth
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1993-11-03· cited 10×
• Brown v. Benston
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1997-09-10· cited 1×
• State v. Howard
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-03· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Sullens
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1992-10-22· cited 30×
• State v. Disorbo
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1981-11-23· cited 13×
• State v. Sullens
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 1991-04-17· cited 7×