Idaho Supreme Court· 10/28/2002
State v. Suiter
Citations
- 56 P.3d 775
- 138 Idaho 13
- 2002 Ida. LEXIS 166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- telling a detective to “fuck off” may be “vulgar and impolite,” but cannot be characterized as fighting words, under Cohen and Chaplinsky, because it is a relative common phrase that does not demean or abuse the person to whom it is directed
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kidwell, Trout, Schroeder, Walters, Eismann
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1942-03-09· cited 2,706×
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1971-06-07· cited 1,777×
- Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court· 1972-03-23· cited 1,392×
- State v. CobbIdaho Supreme Court· 1998-12-02· cited 80×
- Ireland v. IrelandIdaho Supreme Court· 1993-06-09· cited 53×
- State v. TrevinoIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-05-20· cited 36×
- State v. HammersleyIdaho Supreme Court· 2000-09-08· cited 20×
- State v. RoyIdaho Supreme Court· 1995-06-30· cited 15×
- State v. SalsburyIdaho Supreme Court· 1996-08-28· cited 11×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.