Skip to main content

State v. Stuhr

Citations

  • 284 N.W.2d 459
  • 92 Wis. 2d 46
  • 1979 Wisc. App. LEXIS 2748

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “To hold otherwise would be to require judges to disregard the effect of the sentences they impose”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dean, Donlin, Foley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.