State v. Strickland
Citations
- 2019 Ohio 3922
Syllabus
Appellate counsel filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), asserting that there are no non-frivolous issues for appeal. The trial court complied with Crim.R. 11. After being indicted on ten offenses, the appellant knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered guilty pleas to aggravated vehicular homicide, aggravated vehicular assault, and operating a vehicle under the influence (with three priors) he received an agreed-upon 17-year prison sentence, stipulated restitution and a statutorily mandated fine. An agreed-upon sentence is not subject to appellate review. R.C. 2953.08(D)(1). Appellant cannot challenge stipulated restitution or a statutorily-mandated fine. An independent review of the record reveals no non-frivolous issues for appeal. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Hall
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1 case in this archive cites this case.
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-05-08· cited 87,848×
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court· 1988-11-29· cited 13,912×
- State v. Marcum (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-03-15· cited 2,307×
- State v. Sergent (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2016-04-27· cited 162×
- State v. McMullenOhio Court of Appeals· 2015-09-16· cited 5×
- State v. RussellOhio Court of Appeals· 2012-05-25· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.