State v. Strickland

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• bare allegation of \vacation conflict\ did not justify continuance
• bare allegation of “vacation conflict” did not justify continuance

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Cornell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1994-08-02· cited 97×
• Lizarríbar v. Martínez Gelpí
  Supreme Court of Puerto Rico· 1988-06-30· cited 39×
• State v. Vasko
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1998-03-10· cited 36×
• State v. Heise
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1977-12-08· cited 9×
• Calisto Mariko Wells v. State of Arizona
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 2013-02-28· cited 7×

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Faretta v. California
  Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 11,585×
• Moore v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1973-11-05· cited 594×
• United States v. Herbert A. Ellenbogen
  Second Circuit· 1966-09-15· cited 88×
• State v. Mitchell
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1976-01-23· cited 28×
• State v. Barnett
  Arizona Supreme Court· 1975-09-30· cited 17×
• State v. Bullock
  Washington Supreme Court· 1967-08-24· cited 11×
• People v. Bright
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1966-11-01· cited 10×
• Robert F. Lamoureux v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts
  First Circuit· 1969-03-20· cited 8×
• State v. Corrales
  Court of Appeals of Arizona· 1976-04-14· cited 6×
• People v. Armstrong
  Michigan Court of Appeals· 1970-12-03· cited 5×