State v. Straub

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The dispositive issue is whether substantial evidence in the record supports the ... decision that ... [the defendant] did not reasonably believe that [his acts] were immediately necessary to protect himself against the use of force[.]” (Citation omitted.)
• \The dispositive issue is whether substantial evidence in the record supports the . . . decision that . . . [the defendant] did not reasonably believe that [his acts] were immediately necessary to protect himself against the use of force[.]\ (Citation omitted.)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• State v. Lubong
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1994-12-27· cited 33×
• State v. Deleon.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2014-01-15· cited 33×
• State v. Augustin
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2002-12-17· cited 29×
• State v. Maumalanga
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1998-08-11· cited 11×
• State v. DeCastro
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1996-03-14· cited 7×
• In re: O.H.
  Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 2025-05-23