State v. Strasburger

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[A] difference in personal philosophy about the use of money or any other difference in personal beliefs from that held as the ‘perceived norm’ of society by others is not a per se basis on which an involuntary commitment may be made.”
• evidence that the allegedly mentally ill person “recognizes the necessity of some activity on his part to provide for his survival,” such as finding gainful employment or “depending on the good will of other people,” supported a finding that he was able to provide for his basic needs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).