Ohio Court of Appeals· 6/7/2024
State v. Strange
Citations
- 2024 Ohio 2199
Syllabus
Zmuda, J., writing for the majority, finds that the trial court erred in failing to give correct self-defense jury instruction in that it reversed the burden of persuasion to require appellant to prove self-defense rather than requiring the state to disprove that element. The case is remanded for new trial on the convicted offenses only.
Judges: Zmuda
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Fong Foo v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1962-03-19· cited 557×
- State v. GustafsonOhio Supreme Court· 1996-07-30· cited 205×
- Cromer v. Children's Hosp. Med. Ctr. of Akron (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2015-01-27· cited 135×
- State v. MooreOhio Court of Appeals· 2021-03-12· cited 12×
- State ex rel. Ramirez-Ortiz v. Telfth Dist. Court of Appeals (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court· 2017-09-27· cited 7×
- State v. HermesOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-06-16· cited 7×
- State v. IrvinOhio Court of Appeals· 2023-09-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.